Honda Accord 2001 vs Mazda 3 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 167 HP | |
| Torque: | 205 NM | 228 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Honda Accord engine produces 17 HP less power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 23 NM less than Mazda 3. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 7.7 | |
|
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Honda Accord consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda Accord could require 255 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.47 m | |
| Honda Accord and Mazda 3 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 335 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda Accord is 1 metres more than that of the Mazda 3, which means Honda Accord can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Mazda 3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Honda Accord has serious deffects in 460 percent more cases than Mazda 3, so Mazda 3 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Accord has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |