Honda Accord 1998 vs Nissan Sentra 1998

 
Honda Accord
1998 - 2001
Nissan Sentra
1998 - 2006
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.2 Petrol2.5 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming chain
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors.

Performance

Power: 212 HP177 HP
Torque: 215 NM244 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.2 seconds7.2 seconds
Honda Accord engine produces 35 HP more power than Nissan Sentra, but torque is 29 NM less than Nissan Sentra.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.69.6
Fuel tank capacity: 65 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 670 km in combined cycle520 km in combined cycle
830 km on highway590 km on highway
Honda Accord gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Engine production duration: 11 years25 years
Engine spread: Used also on Honda PreludeUsed also on Nissan X-Trail
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Sentra might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.60 m4.51 m
Width: 1.75 m1.71 m
Height: 1.43 m1.41 m
Honda Accord is larger.
Honda Accord is 9 cm longer than the Nissan Sentra, 4 cm wider, while the height of Honda Accord is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 430 litres329 litres
Honda Accord has more luggage capacity.
Honda Accord has 101 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Sentra.
Turning diameter: 11.4 metersno data
Gross weight (kg): 1`820no data
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average
no data
Average price (€): 1000no data
Pros and Cons: Honda Accord has
  • timing belt engine
  • more power
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Nissan Sentra has
  • timing chain engine
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv