Honda Accord 1998 vs Toyota Carina E 1994
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 184 NM | 186 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 8.4 seconds | |
|
Toyota Carina E is a more dynamic driving. Honda Accord engine produces 28 HP less power than Toyota Carina E, whereas torque is 2 NM less than Toyota Carina E. Due to the lower power, Honda Accord reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 | 7.8 | |
|
The Toyota Carina E is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Honda Accord consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Carina E, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda Accord could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 21 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Honda CR-V | Used also on Toyota Celica | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Carina E might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Honda Accord is larger. Honda Accord is 7 cm longer than the Toyota Carina E, 5 cm wider, while the height of Honda Accord is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 470 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1250 litres | |
|
Toyota Carina E has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Honda Accord uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda Accord is 0.1 metres less than that of the Toyota Carina E. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`890 kg | 1`700 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`365 kg | 1`180 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 525 kg | 520 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Honda Accord has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Toyota Carina E has serious deffects in 70 percent more cases than Honda Accord, so Honda Accord quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Accord has
|
Toyota Carina E has
| |