Honda Accord 1998 vs Mazda 626 1991
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 106 HP | |
| Torque: | 140 NM | 157 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
|
Mazda 626 is a more dynamic driving. Honda Accord engine produces 9 HP more power than Mazda 626, but torque is 17 NM less than Mazda 626. Despite the higher power, Honda Accord reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 7.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km | |
|
By specification Honda Accord consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 626, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda Accord could require 120 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Honda Accord consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 626. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.39 m | |
| Honda Accord is 10 cm shorter than the Mazda 626, width is practically the same , while the height of Honda Accord is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 455 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 747 litres | |
|
Mazda 626 has more luggage space. Honda Accord has 25 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 626. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda Accord is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mazda 626. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`740 | 1`675 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Honda Accord has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 626 has serious deffects in 295 percent more cases than Honda Accord, so Honda Accord quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Accord has
|
Mazda 626 has
| |