Honda Accord 2011 vs Mazda 6 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
| Honda Accord and Mazda 6 have the same engine power, but Honda Accord torque is 30 NM less than Mazda 6. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 4.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.1 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda Accord consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda Accord could require 165 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda Accord consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1180 km in combined cycle | 1400 km in combined cycle | |
| 1410 km on highway | 1630 km on highway | ||
| 1060 km with real consumption | 1030 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 380'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda 6 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Honda CR-V, Honda Civic | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 3, Mazda CX-7 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Honda Accord is 5 cm shorter than the Mazda 6, width is practically the same , while the height of Honda Accord is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 406 litres | 502 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1183 litres | no data | |
|
Mazda 6 has more luggage space. Honda Accord has 96 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 6. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda Accord is 0.1 metres less than that of the Mazda 6. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`100 | 2`090 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | Mazda 6 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Honda Accord has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Mazda 6, so Mazda 6 quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 5400 | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Accord has
|
Mazda 6 has
| |