Honda Accord 2005 vs Honda CR-V 2004
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
| Honda Accord and Honda CR-V have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Honda Accord reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 6.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.4 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
The Honda Accord is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda Accord consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that by driving the Honda Accord over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda Accord consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 1350 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| 1010 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
| Honda Accord gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Honda CR-V 2004: Car features Honda`s real-time four-wheel-drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. A multi-plate clutch transfers torque to the rear axle when wheel slip is detected (pressure is applied to the clutch by a dual-pump system). To allow ABS to work smoothly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 8 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.71 m | |
| Honda Accord is 11 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Honda Accord is 24 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 572 litres | 525 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1657 litres | 952 litres | |
|
Honda Accord has more luggage capacity. Honda Accord has 47 litres more trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda Accord (by 705 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda Accord is 1 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Honda Accord can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`930 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Honda CR-V has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Honda Accord has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.1/10 | 8.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Accord has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |