Honda Accord 2003 vs Volkswagen Jetta 2005
Body: | Estate car / wagon | Sedan | |
---|---|---|---|
The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 155 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 190 NM | 200 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
Volkswagen Jetta is a more dynamic driving. Honda Accord engine produces 5 HP more power than Volkswagen Jetta, but torque is 10 NM less than Volkswagen Jetta. Despite the higher power, Honda Accord reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 8.0 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.5 l/100km | 8.9 l/100km | |
By specification Honda Accord consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Jetta, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda Accord could require 45 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Honda Accord consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Jetta. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
950 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
760 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
Honda Accord gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 350'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Honda Accord engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 10 years | 5 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda CR-V, Honda FR-V, Honda Stream | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Golf, Audi A3, Seat Altea, Seat Leon | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
The Volkswagen Jetta engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Honda Accord 2003 2.0 engine: In 2001, Honda introduced the K-series engine lineup, featuring an aluminum block with an open-deck design and cast-iron cylinder liners. It utilizes a port fuel injection system, a 16-valve aluminum cylinder head without hydraulic lifters, individual ignition coils, a VTC cam ... More about Honda Accord 2003 2.0 engine Volkswagen Jetta 2005 2.0 engine: 2.0 FSI engine, part of the EA827 family, features a lightweight aluminum block with cast-iron liners and a unique timing system. A toothed belt drives the exhaust camshaft, while the intake camshaft is driven by a single-row chain, which also integrates with the variable valve timing mechanism. The timing regulator is ... More about Volkswagen Jetta 2005 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.75 m | 4.55 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.78 m | |
Height: | 1.47 m | 1.46 m | |
Honda Accord is 20 cm longer than the Volkswagen Jetta, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Honda Accord is 1 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 572 litres | 527 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1657 litres | no data | |
Honda Accord has more luggage capacity. Honda Accord has 45 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Jetta. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`030 | 1`910 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 1600 | 1800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Honda Accord has
|
Volkswagen Jetta has
| |