Honda Accord 1995 vs Mercedes E class 1993
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.2 Petrol | 2.2 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 198 NM | 210 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
Honda Accord and Mercedes E class have the same engine power, but Honda Accord torque is 12 NM less than Mercedes E class. Honda Accord reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 9.6 | |
The Honda Accord is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Honda Accord consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes E class, which means that by driving the Honda Accord over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 72 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
Mercedes E class gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Front-wheel drive cars (Honda Accord) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mercedes E class) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 600'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mercedes E class engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 6 years | 8 years | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
The Mercedes E class engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.77 m | 4.76 m | |
Width: | 1.78 m | 1.74 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.49 m | |
Honda Accord is larger, but lower. Honda Accord is 1 cm longer than the Mercedes E class, 4 cm wider, while the height of Honda Accord is 7 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 530 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
739 litres | 885 litres | |
Mercedes E class has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Honda Accord has 100 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes E class. This could mean that the Honda Accord uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mercedes E class (by 146 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Honda Accord is 0.1 metres less than that of the Mercedes E class. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`880 | 2`150 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | average | |
Mercedes E class has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Honda Accord, so Mercedes E class quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 3800 | 2800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Honda Accord has
|
Mercedes E klase has
| |