Honda Accord 1995 vs Mitsubishi Galant 2000
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 184 NM | 191 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Galant is a more dynamic driving. Honda Accord and Mitsubishi Galant have the same engine power, but Honda Accord torque is 7 NM less than Mitsubishi Galant. Honda Accord reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 | 8.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.1 l/100km | 9.2 l/100km | |
|
By specification Honda Accord consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Galant, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda Accord could require 45 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Honda Accord consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Galant. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 710 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| Honda Accord gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Honda Accord is larger. Honda Accord is 14 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Galant, 4 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 470 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
739 litres | 1400 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Galant has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Honda Accord has 40 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Galant. This could mean that the Honda Accord uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Galant (by 661 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda Accord is 0.3 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Galant. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`880 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | Mitsubishi Galant has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Honda Accord has serious deffects in 80 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Galant, so Mitsubishi Galant quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 3800 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Accord has
|
Mitsubishi Galant has
| |