Honda Accord 2001 vs Renault Laguna 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.9 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Honda Accord) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Renault Laguna) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Renault Laguna is a more dynamic driving. Honda Accord engine produces 16 HP more power than Renault Laguna, but torque is 95 NM less than Renault Laguna. Despite the higher power, Honda Accord reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.8 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Laguna is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda Accord consumes 3.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Laguna, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda Accord could require 465 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda Accord consumes 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Laguna. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 1270 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 1520 km on highway | ||
| 730 km with real consumption | 1120 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Laguna gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 11 other car models, including Volvo V40, Renault Scenic, Volvo S40, Mitsubishi Carisma | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Laguna might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Laguna 2001 1.9 engine: Long-lasting and fuel-efficient engine. Maintaining oil change and maintenance intervals is essential for a long engine life, as poor or untimely oil changes can result in turbine and oil pump damage, followed ... More about Renault Laguna 2001 1.9 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.43 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Honda Accord is 2 cm longer than the Renault Laguna, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda Accord is 0.5 metres more than that of the Renault Laguna, which means Honda Accord can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Honda Accord has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Laguna has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Honda Accord, so Honda Accord quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Accord has
|
Renault Laguna has
| |