Honda Accord 2001 vs Mazda 6 2002

 
Honda Accord
2001 - 2003
Mazda 6
2002 - 2005
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.8 Petrol2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming chain
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors.

Performance

Power: 136 HP141 HP
Torque: 175 NM181 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.1 seconds9.9 seconds
Mazda 6 is a more dynamic driving.
Honda Accord engine produces 5 HP less power than Mazda 6, whereas torque is 6 NM less than Mazda 6. Due to the lower power, Honda Accord reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.68.5
Real fuel consumption: 8.9 l/100km8.4 l/100km
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Honda Accord consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda Accord could require 15 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda Accord consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6.
Fuel tank capacity: 65 litres64 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 750 km in combined cycle750 km in combined cycle
950 km on highway960 km on highway
730 km with real consumption760 km with real consumption

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 440'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 9 years13 years
Engine spread: Used only for this carInstalled on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 3, Mazda MX-5, Mazda 5, Mazda CX-5
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda 6 might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.60 m4.67 m
Width: 1.75 m1.78 m
Height: 1.43 m1.44 m
Both cars are similar in size. Honda Accord is 7 cm shorter than the Mazda 6, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Honda Accord is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data492 litres
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Honda Accord is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mazda 6, which means Honda Accord can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): no data1`855
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

above average
Average price (€): 12001000
Pros and Cons: Honda Accord has
  • timing belt engine
  • longer expected engine lifespan
Mazda 6 has
  • timing chain engine
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv