Honda Accord 1999 vs Honda Civic 1996
| Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 NM | 153 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 seconds | 8.1 seconds | |
|
Honda Civic is a more dynamic driving. Honda Accord engine produces 24 HP less power than Honda Civic, but torque is 22 NM more than Honda Civic. Due to the lower power, Honda Accord reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 8.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.9 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km | |
|
The Honda Civic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda Accord consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Civic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda Accord could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda Accord consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Civic. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 530 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 650 km on highway | ||
| 730 km with real consumption | 530 km with real consumption | ||
| Honda Accord gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Honda CRX | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Honda Civic might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.46 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.39 m | |
|
Honda Accord is larger. Honda Accord is 14 cm longer than the Honda Civic, 5 cm wider, while the height of Honda Accord is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 335 litres | |
|
Honda Accord has more luggage capacity. Honda Accord has 95 litres more trunk space than the Honda Civic. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda Accord is 1.4 metres more than that of the Honda Civic, which means Honda Accord can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`930 | 1`690 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Honda Civic has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Honda Accord has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Honda Civic, so Honda Civic quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Accord has
|
Honda Civic has
| |