Honda Accord 2011 vs Honda CR-V 2010
| Body: | Sedan | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Honda Accord is more dynamic to drive. Honda Accord engine produces 30 HP more power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Honda CR-V. Thanks to more power Honda Accord reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 7.4 | |
|
The Honda Accord is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Honda Accord consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that by driving the Honda Accord over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1160 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 1350 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| Honda Accord gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Honda CR-V 2010: Car features Honda`s real-time four-wheel-drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. A multi-plate clutch transfers torque to the rear axle when wheel slip is identified (pressure is provided to the clutch by a dual-pump system). To allow ABS to work seamlessly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Honda Accord is larger, but lower. Honda Accord is 20 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 3 cm wider, while the height of Honda Accord is 24 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 464 litres | 524 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Honda Accord uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda Accord is 0.3 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | 2`160 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Honda CR-V has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Honda Accord has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7600 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Accord has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |