Honda Accord 2011 vs Honda CR-V 2010
| Body: | Sedan | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Honda Accord is more dynamic to drive. Honda Accord engine produces 30 HP more power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Honda CR-V. Thanks to more power Honda Accord reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 7.4 | |
|
The Honda Accord is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Honda Accord consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that by driving the Honda Accord over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1160 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 1350 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| Honda Accord gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Honda CR-V 2010: Car features Honda`s real-time four-wheel-drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. A multi-plate clutch transfers torque to the rear axle when wheel slip is identified (pressure is provided to the clutch by a dual-pump system). To allow ABS to work seamlessly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Honda Accord is larger, but lower. Honda Accord is 20 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 3 cm wider, while the height of Honda Accord is 24 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 464 litres | 524 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Honda Accord has 60 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. This could mean that the Honda Accord uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda Accord is 0.3 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`160 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Honda CR-V has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Honda Accord has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Accord has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |