Honda Accord 2012 vs Skoda Superb 2013

 
Honda Accord
2012 - 2015
Skoda Superb
2013 - 2015
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.4 Petrol1.8 Petrol

Performance

Power: 188 HP152 HP
Torque: 247 NM250 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds8.7 seconds
Honda Accord engine produces 36 HP more power than Skoda Superb, but torque is 3 NM less than Skoda Superb.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.17.1
The Skoda Superb is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Honda Accord consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda Accord could require 150 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 65 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 800 km in combined cycle840 km in combined cycle
970 km on highway1050 km on highway
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.86 m4.84 m
Width: 1.85 m1.82 m
Height: 1.47 m1.46 m
Both cars are similar in size. Honda Accord is 2 cm longer than the Skoda Superb, 3 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 447 litres595 litres
Skoda Superb has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Honda Accord has 148 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Superb. This could mean that the Honda Accord uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: no data11.5 meters
Gross weight (kg): no data2`071
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

average
Skoda Superb has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Honda Accord has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Skoda Superb, so Skoda Superb quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 840017 200
Pros and Cons: Honda Accord has
  • more power
  • lower price
Skoda Superb has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv