Honda Accord 2012 vs Skoda Superb 2013
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 188 HP | 152 HP | |
Torque: | 247 NM | 250 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.7 seconds | |
Honda Accord engine produces 36 HP more power than Skoda Superb, but torque is 3 NM less than Skoda Superb. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 7.1 | |
The Skoda Superb is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Honda Accord consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda Accord could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
970 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.86 m | 4.84 m | |
Width: | 1.85 m | 1.82 m | |
Height: | 1.47 m | 1.46 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Honda Accord is 2 cm longer than the Skoda Superb, 3 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 447 litres | 595 litres | |
Skoda Superb has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Honda Accord has 148 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Superb. This could mean that the Honda Accord uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 11.5 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`071 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | average | |
Skoda Superb has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Honda Accord has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Skoda Superb, so Skoda Superb quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 8400 | 17 200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Honda Accord has
|
Skoda Superb has
| |