Honda Accord 2001 vs Mazda 3 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.3 (petrol) | 1.6 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 - 212 HP | 105 - 185 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 - 215 NM | 145 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.2 - 11.8 seconds | 8.2 - 13.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 - 9.6 | 4.4 - 8.1 | |
|
Honda Accord petrol engines consumes on average 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.47 m | |
| Honda Accord is 3 cm longer than the Mazda 3, width is practically the same , while the height of Honda Accord is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 430 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda Accord is 1 metres more than that of the Mazda 3, which means Honda Accord can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`827 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Accord has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |