Honda Accord 2008 vs Honda CR-V 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Honda Accord is available only with front wheel drive, while Honda CR-V can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.4 | 2.0 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 201 HP | 140 - 166 HP | |
| Torque: | 192 - 350 NM | 192 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 - 11.2 seconds | 10.2 - 12.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 - 9.0 | 6.5 - 9.5 | |
|
Honda Accord petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Honda CR-V. On average, Honda Accord equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Honda Accord is larger, but lower. Honda Accord is 23 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 2 cm wider, while the height of Honda Accord is 21 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 395 litres | 556 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1252 litres | 1532 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Honda Accord uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 280 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`100 kg | ~ 2`098 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`702 kg | ~ 1`556 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 398 kg | ~ 542 kg | |
| Honda Accord load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 36 procentiem less than Honda CR-V. Therefore, Honda CR-V is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Accord has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |