Honda Accord 2001 vs Chrysler Neon 1994
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
---|---|---|---|
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
Engines: | 1.8 | 1.8 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 136 HP | 115 - 133 HP | |
Torque: | 175 NM | 152 - 175 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 - 12.1 seconds | 8.8 - 11.1 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 - 9.5 | 8.0 - 8.5 | |
Honda Accord petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Chrysler Neon. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.60 m | 4.36 m | |
Width: | 1.75 m | 1.71 m | |
Height: | 1.43 m | 1.37 m | |
Honda Accord is larger. Honda Accord is 24 cm longer than the Chrysler Neon, 4 cm wider, while the height of Honda Accord is 6 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 364 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Honda Accord is 0.5 metres more than that of the Chrysler Neon, which means Honda Accord can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`610 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | above average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 1200 | 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Chrysler Neon has
| |