Honda Accord 2001 vs Chrysler Neon 1994

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Honda Accord
2001 - 2003
Chrysler Neon
1994 - 1999
Body: HatchbackSedan
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.81.8 - 2.0

Performance

Power: 136 HP115 - 133 HP
Torque: 175 NM152 - 175 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.1 - 12.1 seconds8.8 - 11.1 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.6 - 9.58.0 - 8.5
Honda Accord petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Chrysler Neon.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.60 m4.36 m
Width: 1.75 m1.71 m
Height: 1.43 m1.37 m
Honda Accord is larger.
Honda Accord is 24 cm longer than the Chrysler Neon, 4 cm wider, while the height of Honda Accord is 6 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no data364 litres
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Honda Accord is 0.5 metres more than that of the Chrysler Neon, which means Honda Accord can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): no data~ 1`610
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average
no data
Average price (€): 1200600
Pros and Cons:
    Chrysler Neon has
    • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv