Honda Accord 1999 vs Kia Optima 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.3 (petrol, diesel) | 1.8 - 2.7 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 - 154 HP | 134 - 181 HP | |
| Torque: | 140 - 210 NM | 169 - 245 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 - 13.5 seconds | 8.5 - 10.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 - 9.2 | 9.1 - 10.4 | |
|
Honda Accord petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Kia Optima. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Honda Accord is smaller, but slightly higher. Honda Accord is 13 cm shorter than the Kia Optima, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Honda Accord is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 479 litres | |
|
Kia Optima has more luggage space. Honda Accord has 29 litres less trunk space than the Kia Optima. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda Accord is 1 metres more than that of the Kia Optima, which means Honda Accord can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`914 | ~ 1`903 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Accord has
|
Kia Optima has
| |