Ford Scorpio 1997 vs Opel Omega 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Opel Omega is a more dynamic driving. Ford Scorpio engine produces 35 HP less power than Opel Omega, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Opel Omega. Due to the lower power, Ford Scorpio reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 7.8 | |
|
The Opel Omega is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Scorpio consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Omega, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Scorpio could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 1190 km on highway | ||
| Opel Omega gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.50 m | |
| Ford Scorpio is 7 cm shorter than the Opel Omega, 9 cm wider, while the height of Ford Scorpio is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 540 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1800 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Scorpio is 0.6 metres less than that of the Opel Omega, which means Ford Scorpio can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`685 | 2`290 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | Opel Omega has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Scorpio has serious deffects in 120 percent more cases than Opel Omega, so Opel Omega quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | no data | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Scorpio has
|
Opel Omega has
| |