Ford Scorpio 1997 vs Jaguar XJ 1997
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.9 Petrol | 3.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 207 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 281 NM | 316 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XJ is a more dynamic driving. Ford Scorpio engine produces 33 HP less power than Jaguar XJ, whereas torque is 35 NM less than Jaguar XJ. Due to the lower power, Ford Scorpio reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.6 | 12.1 | |
| Ford Scorpio consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XJ, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Scorpio could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 81 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 550 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 730 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| Jaguar XJ gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 5.02 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.31 m | |
| Ford Scorpio is 20 cm shorter than the Jaguar XJ, 8 cm wider, while the height of Ford Scorpio is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 12.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Scorpio is 1.7 metres less than that of the Jaguar XJ, which means Ford Scorpio can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`850 | 1`900 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 7800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Scorpio has
|
Jaguar XJ has
| |