Ford Scorpio 1997 vs Opel Omega 1994
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 12 seconds | |
| Ford Scorpio engine produces 15 HP less power than Opel Omega, but torque is 10 NM more than Opel Omega. Despite less power, Ford Scorpio reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 7.4 | |
|
The Opel Omega is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Scorpio consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Omega, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Scorpio could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 1220 km on highway | ||
| Opel Omega gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Ford Scorpio is larger, but lower. Ford Scorpio is 3 cm longer than the Opel Omega, 9 cm wider, while the height of Ford Scorpio is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 530 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 830 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Scorpio is 0.6 metres less than that of the Opel Omega, which means Ford Scorpio can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`770 | 2`170 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Ford Scorpio has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Opel Omega, so Ford Scorpio quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Scorpio has
|
Opel Omega has
| |