Ford Scorpio 1997 vs Alfa Romeo 164 1992
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 294 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
|
Alfa Romeo 164 is a more dynamic driving. Ford Scorpio engine produces 10 HP less power than Alfa Romeo 164, whereas torque is 34 NM less than Alfa Romeo 164. Due to the lower power, Ford Scorpio reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 6.8 | |
|
The Alfa Romeo 164 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Scorpio consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo 164, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Scorpio could require 225 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 1020 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
| Alfa Romeo 164 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.39 m | |
|
Ford Scorpio is larger. Ford Scorpio is 26 cm longer than the Alfa Romeo 164, 12 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 504 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Scorpio is 0.4 metres less than that of the Alfa Romeo 164, which means Ford Scorpio can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`770 | 2`050 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Alfa Romeo 164 has
| |