Ford Scorpio 1997 vs Alfa Romeo 164 1992
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 146 HP | |
| Torque: | 202 NM | 187 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
| Ford Scorpio engine produces 1 HP more power than Alfa Romeo 164, whereas torque is 15 NM more than Alfa Romeo 164. Despite the higher power, Ford Scorpio reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 8.2 | |
|
The Alfa Romeo 164 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Scorpio consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo 164, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Scorpio could require 345 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 1070 km on highway | ||
| Alfa Romeo 164 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.39 m | |
|
Ford Scorpio is larger. Ford Scorpio is 26 cm longer than the Alfa Romeo 164, 12 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 505 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Scorpio is 0.4 metres less than that of the Alfa Romeo 164, which means Ford Scorpio can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`850 | 1`950 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Alfa Romeo 164 has
| |