Ford Scorpio 1997 vs Opel Omega 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 167 NM | 175 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 13 seconds | |
| Ford Scorpio engine produces 1 HP less power than Opel Omega, whereas torque is 8 NM less than Opel Omega. Despite less power, Ford Scorpio reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 8.9 | |
|
The Opel Omega is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Scorpio consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Omega, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Scorpio could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 1040 km on highway | ||
| Opel Omega gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Ford Scorpio is larger, but lower. Ford Scorpio is 3 cm longer than the Opel Omega, 9 cm wider, while the height of Ford Scorpio is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 530 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 830 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Scorpio is 0.6 metres less than that of the Opel Omega, which means Ford Scorpio can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`620 | 2`010 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Ford Scorpio has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Opel Omega, so Ford Scorpio quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Scorpio has
|
Opel Omega has
| |