Ford Scorpio 1992 vs Audi 100 1991
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.9 Petrol | 2.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 146 HP | 174 HP | |
| Torque: | 228 NM | 245 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
| Ford Scorpio engine produces 28 HP less power than Audi 100, whereas torque is 17 NM less than Audi 100. Despite less power, Ford Scorpio reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.7 | 10.6 | |
| Ford Scorpio consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi 100, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Scorpio could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| Audi 100 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.74 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Ford Scorpio is smaller, but higher. Ford Scorpio is 5 cm shorter than the Audi 100, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Scorpio is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 390 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1310 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Scorpio is 1 metres less than that of the Audi 100, which means Ford Scorpio can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 2`020 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Audi 100 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Ford Scorpio, so Audi 100 quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 600 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Scorpio has
|
Audi 100 has
| |