Ford Scorpio 1992 vs Opel Omega 1989
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.3 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 92 HP | 73 HP | |
| Torque: | 201 NM | 138 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.8 seconds | 20.5 seconds | |
|
Ford Scorpio is more dynamic to drive. Ford Scorpio engine produces 19 HP more power than Opel Omega, whereas torque is 63 NM more than Opel Omega. Thanks to more power Ford Scorpio reaches 100 km/h speed 5.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 7.2 | |
|
The Opel Omega is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Scorpio consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Omega, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Scorpio could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| Opel Omega gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.74 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Scorpio is 3 cm shorter than the Opel Omega, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Scorpio is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 525 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1855 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Scorpio is 0.5 metres less than that of the Opel Omega, which means Ford Scorpio can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Ford Scorpio has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Opel Omega, so Ford Scorpio quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 600 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Scorpio has
|
Opel Omega has
| |