Ford Scorpio 1992 vs Opel Omega 1989
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 182 NM | 195 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
| Ford Scorpio and Opel Omega have the same engine power, but Ford Scorpio torque is 13 NM less than Opel Omega. Ford Scorpio reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.3 | 9.6 | |
|
The Opel Omega is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Scorpio consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Omega, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Scorpio could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| Opel Omega gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.74 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Scorpio is 3 cm shorter than the Opel Omega, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Scorpio is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 520 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1855 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Scorpio is 0.5 metres less than that of the Opel Omega, which means Ford Scorpio can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`475 | 1`950 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Ford Scorpio has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Opel Omega, so Ford Scorpio quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 600 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Scorpio has
|
Opel Omega has
| |