Ford Scorpio 1992 vs Audi 80 1992
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 125 HP | 133 HP | |
Torque: | 182 NM | 186 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
Audi 80 is a more dynamic driving. Ford Scorpio engine produces 8 HP less power than Audi 80, whereas torque is 4 NM less than Audi 80. Due to the lower power, Ford Scorpio reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.3 | 9.0 | |
The Audi 80 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Scorpio consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi 80, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Scorpio could require 195 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 66 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
Audi 80 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.74 m | 4.48 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.49 m | 1.41 m | |
Ford Scorpio is larger. Ford Scorpio is 26 cm longer than the Audi 80, 6 cm wider, while the height of Ford Scorpio is 8 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 370 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1200 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford Scorpio is 0.8 metres less than that of the Audi 80, which means Ford Scorpio can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`475 | 1`860 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | below average | average | |
Audi 80 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Scorpio has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Audi 80, so Audi 80 quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | 600 | 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford Scorpio has
|
Audi 80 has
| |