Ford Scorpio 1992 vs Opel Omega 1989
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 171 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 13.5 seconds | |
|
Ford Scorpio is more dynamic to drive. Ford Scorpio engine produces 5 HP more power than Opel Omega, whereas torque is 1 NM more than Opel Omega. Thanks to more power Ford Scorpio reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 9.2 | |
|
The Ford Scorpio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Scorpio consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Omega, which means that by driving the Ford Scorpio over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| Ford Scorpio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.74 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Scorpio is 3 cm shorter than the Opel Omega, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Scorpio is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 525 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1855 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Scorpio is 0.5 metres less than that of the Opel Omega, which means Ford Scorpio can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`650 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Opel Omega has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Ford Scorpio, so Opel Omega quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 600 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Scorpio has
|
| |