Ford Scorpio 1992 vs Volvo 960 1990
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 171 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford Scorpio engine produces 70 HP less power than Volvo 960, whereas torque is 109 NM less than Volvo 960. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 11.2 | |
|
The Ford Scorpio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Scorpio consumes 3.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 960, which means that by driving the Ford Scorpio over 15,000 km in a year you can save 465 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| Ford Scorpio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.74 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.44 m | |
| Ford Scorpio is 11 cm shorter than the Volvo 960, 1 cm wider, while the height of Ford Scorpio is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 992 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2125 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Scorpio is 0.5 metres more than that of the Volvo 960, which means Ford Scorpio can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`650 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Scorpio has
|
Volvo 960 has
| |