Ford Scorpio 1995 vs Volvo 960 1994
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.9 Petrol | 2.9 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 229 NM | 267 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
|
Volvo 960 is a more dynamic driving. Ford Scorpio engine produces 54 HP less power than Volvo 960, whereas torque is 38 NM less than Volvo 960. Due to the lower power, Ford Scorpio reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.3 | 11.1 | |
| Ford Scorpio consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 960, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Scorpio could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| Volvo 960 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.46 m | |
| Ford Scorpio is 3 cm shorter than the Volvo 960, 12 cm wider, while the height of Ford Scorpio is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 992 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2125 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Scorpio is 0.6 metres more than that of the Volvo 960, which means Ford Scorpio can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`060 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Scorpio has
|
Volvo 960 has
| |