Ford Scorpio 1993 vs Seat Toledo 1991
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 166 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
| Ford Scorpio and Seat Toledo have the same engine power, but Ford Scorpio torque is 104 NM more than Seat Toledo. Ford Scorpio reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 8.2 | |
|
The Ford Scorpio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Scorpio consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Toledo, which means that by driving the Ford Scorpio over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| Ford Scorpio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Seat Toledo) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Ford Scorpio) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Ford Scorpio is larger. Ford Scorpio is 35 cm longer than the Seat Toledo, 10 cm wider, while the height of Ford Scorpio is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Scorpio is 0.1 metres less than that of the Seat Toledo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`725 | 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Ford Scorpio has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Toledo has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Ford Scorpio, so Ford Scorpio quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Scorpio has
|
Seat Toledo has
| |