Ford Scorpio 1993 vs Fiat Croma 1991

 
Ford Scorpio
1993 - 1994
Fiat Croma
1991 - 1996
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.5 Diesel2.5 Diesel

Performance

Power: 116 HP118 HP
Torque: 270 NM247 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.4 seconds11.5 seconds
Ford Scorpio engine produces 2 HP less power than Fiat Croma, but torque is 23 NM more than Fiat Croma. Despite less power, Ford Scorpio reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.17.2
Ford Scorpio consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Croma, which means that by driving the Ford Scorpio over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres68 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 980 km in combined cycle940 km in combined cycle

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Front-wheel drive cars (Fiat Croma) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Ford Scorpio) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions.

Dimensions

Length: 4.67 m4.52 m
Width: 1.76 m1.76 m
Height: 1.43 m1.44 m
Ford Scorpio is 15 cm longer than the Fiat Croma, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford Scorpio is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no datano data
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Ford Scorpio is 0.2 metres less than that of the Fiat Croma.
Gross weight (kg): 1`7251`400
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average
no data
Average price (€): 2000800
Pros and Cons:
    Fiat Croma has
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv