Ford Scorpio 1992 vs Fiat Croma 1991
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 92 HP | 118 HP | |
Torque: | 201 NM | 247 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
Fiat Croma is a more dynamic driving. Ford Scorpio engine produces 26 HP less power than Fiat Croma, whereas torque is 46 NM less than Fiat Croma. Due to the lower power, Ford Scorpio reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 7.2 | |
The Fiat Croma is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Scorpio consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Croma, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Scorpio could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 68 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
Fiat Croma gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Front-wheel drive cars (Fiat Croma) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Ford Scorpio) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.67 m | 4.52 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.43 m | 1.44 m | |
Ford Scorpio is 15 cm longer than the Fiat Croma, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford Scorpio is 1 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford Scorpio is 0.2 metres less than that of the Fiat Croma. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 1`400 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | below average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 2000 | 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Fiat Croma has
| |