Ford Scorpio 1992 vs Seat Toledo 1991
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 182 NM | 166 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
| Ford Scorpio engine produces 9 HP more power than Seat Toledo, whereas torque is 16 NM more than Seat Toledo. Despite the higher power, Ford Scorpio reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.3 | 8.2 | |
|
The Seat Toledo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Scorpio consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Toledo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Scorpio could require 315 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Seat Toledo) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Ford Scorpio) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Ford Scorpio is larger. Ford Scorpio is 35 cm longer than the Seat Toledo, 10 cm wider, while the height of Ford Scorpio is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Scorpio is 0.1 metres less than that of the Seat Toledo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`850 | 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Ford Scorpio has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Toledo has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Ford Scorpio, so Ford Scorpio quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Scorpio has
|
Seat Toledo has
| |