Ford Scorpio 1992 vs Volvo 960 1990
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 92 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 201 NM | 235 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 13 seconds | |
|
Volvo 960 is a more dynamic driving. Ford Scorpio engine produces 30 HP less power than Volvo 960, whereas torque is 34 NM less than Volvo 960. Due to the lower power, Ford Scorpio reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 8.1 | |
|
The Ford Scorpio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Scorpio consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 960, which means that by driving the Ford Scorpio over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| Volvo 960 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.74 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.41 m | |
| Ford Scorpio is 13 cm shorter than the Volvo 960, 1 cm wider, while the height of Ford Scorpio is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 491 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Scorpio is 0.5 metres more than that of the Volvo 960, which means Ford Scorpio can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 2`060 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Scorpio has
|
Volvo 960 has
| |