Ford Scorpio 1992 vs Subaru Outback 2017
| Body: | Sedan | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 92 HP | 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 201 NM | 235 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
|
Subaru Outback is a more dynamic driving. Ford Scorpio engine produces 83 HP less power than Subaru Outback, whereas torque is 34 NM less than Subaru Outback. Due to the lower power, Ford Scorpio reaches 100 km/h speed 3.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 7.7 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| Ford Scorpio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.74 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Ford Scorpio is smaller. Ford Scorpio is 8 cm shorter than the Subaru Outback, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Scorpio is 25 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 512 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Scorpio is 0.6 metres less than that of the Subaru Outback, which means Ford Scorpio can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 2`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 26 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Scorpio has
|
Subaru Outback has
| |