Ford Scorpio 1992 vs Volvo 940 1990
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 92 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 201 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Volvo 940 is a more dynamic driving. Ford Scorpio engine produces 30 HP less power than Volvo 940, whereas torque is 39 NM less than Volvo 940. Due to the lower power, Ford Scorpio reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 7.9 | |
| Ford Scorpio consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 940, which means that by driving the Ford Scorpio over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.74 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.41 m | |
| Ford Scorpio is 13 cm shorter than the Volvo 940, 1 cm wider, while the height of Ford Scorpio is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 470 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Scorpio is 0.5 metres more than that of the Volvo 940, which means Ford Scorpio can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 1`945 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Volvo 940 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Scorpio has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Volvo 940, so Volvo 940 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Volvo 940 has
| |