Ford Scorpio 1992 vs Audi 100 1991
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 125 HP | 133 HP | |
Torque: | 182 NM | 186 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.9 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
Audi 100 is a more dynamic driving. Ford Scorpio engine produces 8 HP less power than Audi 100, whereas torque is 4 NM less than Audi 100. Due to the lower power, Ford Scorpio reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.3 | 10.0 | |
Ford Scorpio consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi 100, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Scorpio could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 80 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
Audi 100 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.74 m | 4.79 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.78 m | |
Height: | 1.43 m | 1.43 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Ford Scorpio is 5 cm shorter than the Audi 100, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 510 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford Scorpio is 1 metres less than that of the Audi 100, which means Ford Scorpio can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`850 | 1`920 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | below average | average | |
Audi 100 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Ford Scorpio, so Audi 100 quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 2000 | 2200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford Scorpio has
|
Audi 100 has
| |