Ford Scorpio 1992 vs Rover 400 1992
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 125 HP | 136 HP | |
Torque: | 182 NM | 185 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.9 seconds | 8.4 seconds | |
Rover 400 is a more dynamic driving. Ford Scorpio engine produces 11 HP less power than Rover 400, whereas torque is 3 NM less than Rover 400. Due to the lower power, Ford Scorpio reaches 100 km/h speed 4.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.3 | 8.2 | |
The Rover 400 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Scorpio consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Rover 400, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Scorpio could require 315 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Front-wheel drive cars (Rover 400) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Ford Scorpio) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.74 m | 4.37 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.68 m | |
Height: | 1.43 m | 1.40 m | |
Ford Scorpio is larger. Ford Scorpio is 37 cm longer than the Rover 400, 8 cm wider, while the height of Ford Scorpio is 3 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 410 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford Scorpio is 0.2 metres more than that of the Rover 400. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`850 | 1`600 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | below average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 2000 | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Rover 400 has
| |