Ford Scorpio 1992 vs Ford Sierra 1990
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 182 NM | 171 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.9 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
| Ford Scorpio engine produces 5 HP more power than Ford Sierra, whereas torque is 11 NM more than Ford Sierra. Despite the higher power, Ford Scorpio reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.3 | 7.8 | |
|
The Ford Sierra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Scorpio consumes 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Sierra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Scorpio could require 375 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| Ford Sierra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.74 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Ford Scorpio is larger. Ford Scorpio is 27 cm longer than the Ford Sierra, 6 cm wider, while the height of Ford Scorpio is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Scorpio is 0.4 metres more than that of the Ford Sierra, which means Ford Scorpio can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`850 | 1`350 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Ford Scorpio has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Ford Sierra, so Ford Scorpio quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Ford Sierra has
| |