Ford Scorpio 1992 vs Subaru Outback 2017

 
Ford Scorpio
1992 - 1993
Subaru Outback
2017 -
Body: SedanEstate car / wagon
The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: ManualAutomatic
Engine: 2.4 Petrol2.5 Petrol

Performance

Power: 125 HP175 HP
Torque: 182 NM235 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11 seconds10.2 seconds
Subaru Outback is a more dynamic driving.
Ford Scorpio engine produces 50 HP less power than Subaru Outback, whereas torque is 53 NM less than Subaru Outback. Due to the lower power, Ford Scorpio reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.37.7
The Subaru Outback is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Ford Scorpio consumes 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Outback, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Scorpio could require 390 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 670 km in combined cycle770 km in combined cycle
Subaru Outback gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.74 m4.82 m
Width: 1.76 m1.84 m
Height: 1.43 m1.68 m
Ford Scorpio is smaller.
Ford Scorpio is 8 cm shorter than the Subaru Outback, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Scorpio is 25 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data512 litres
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Ford Scorpio is 0.6 metres less than that of the Subaru Outback, which means Ford Scorpio can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8502`100
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average
no data
Average price (€): 200026 400
Pros and Cons: Ford Scorpio has
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Subaru Outback has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • has 4x4 drive
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv