Ford Scorpio 1992 vs Audi 100 1991
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 133 HP | |
| Torque: | 182 NM | 186 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
|
Audi 100 is a more dynamic driving. Ford Scorpio engine produces 8 HP less power than Audi 100, whereas torque is 4 NM less than Audi 100. Due to the lower power, Ford Scorpio reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.3 | 9.5 | |
|
The Audi 100 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Scorpio consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi 100, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Scorpio could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| Audi 100 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.74 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.43 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Scorpio is 5 cm shorter than the Audi 100, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 510 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Scorpio is 1 metres less than that of the Audi 100, which means Ford Scorpio can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`850 | 1`920 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Audi 100 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Ford Scorpio, so Audi 100 quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Scorpio has
|
Audi 100 has
| |