Ford Scorpio 1992 vs Volvo 960 1990
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 171 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford Scorpio engine produces 70 HP less power than Volvo 960, whereas torque is 109 NM less than Volvo 960. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 11.2 | |
|
The Ford Scorpio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Scorpio consumes 3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 960, which means that by driving the Ford Scorpio over 15,000 km in a year you can save 450 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| Ford Scorpio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.74 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.41 m | |
| Ford Scorpio is 13 cm shorter than the Volvo 960, 1 cm wider, while the height of Ford Scorpio is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 491 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`750 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Scorpio has
|
Volvo 960 has
| |