Ford Scorpio 1992 vs Audi 100 1992
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 171 NM | 168 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13 seconds | 13.4 seconds | |
|
Ford Scorpio is more dynamic to drive. Ford Scorpio engine produces 4 HP more power than Audi 100, whereas torque is 3 NM more than Audi 100. Thanks to more power Ford Scorpio reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 8.9 | |
|
The Ford Scorpio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Scorpio consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi 100, which means that by driving the Ford Scorpio over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.74 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.43 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Scorpio is 5 cm shorter than the Audi 100, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 510 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Scorpio is 1 metres less than that of the Audi 100, which means Ford Scorpio can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`750 | 1`875 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Audi 100 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Ford Scorpio, so Audi 100 quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Scorpio has
|
| |