Ford Scorpio 1995 vs Volvo S90 1997
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.9 Petrol | 2.9 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 229 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Volvo S90 is a more dynamic driving. Ford Scorpio engine produces 30 HP less power than Volvo S90, whereas torque is 31 NM less than Volvo S90. Due to the lower power, Ford Scorpio reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.1 | 11.7 | |
|
The Ford Scorpio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Scorpio consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S90, which means that by driving the Ford Scorpio over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| Volvo S90 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.42 m | |
| Ford Scorpio is 5 cm shorter than the Volvo S90, 13 cm wider, while the height of Ford Scorpio is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 9.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Scorpio is 0.7 metres more than that of the Volvo S90, which means Ford Scorpio can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`850 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Scorpio has
|
Volvo S90 has
| |