Ford Scorpio 1996 vs SAAB 9000 1994
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 202 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
SAAB 9000 is a more dynamic driving. Ford Scorpio engine produces 23 HP less power than SAAB 9000, whereas torque is 58 NM less than SAAB 9000. Due to the lower power, Ford Scorpio reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 9.6 | |
|
The SAAB 9000 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Scorpio consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9000, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Scorpio could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (SAAB 9000) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Ford Scorpio) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Ford Scorpio is larger, but slightly lower. Ford Scorpio is 3 cm longer than the SAAB 9000, 10 cm wider, while the height of Ford Scorpio is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Scorpio is 0.5 metres less than that of the SAAB 9000, which means Ford Scorpio can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`850 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Scorpio has
|
SAAB 9000 has
| |