Ford Scorpio 1996 vs Volvo 940 1996
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 202 NM | 264 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 9.1 seconds | |
|
Volvo 940 is a more dynamic driving. Ford Scorpio engine produces 18 HP less power than Volvo 940, whereas torque is 62 NM less than Volvo 940. Due to the lower power, Ford Scorpio reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 9.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.2 l/100km | 10.6 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo 940 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Scorpio consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 940, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Scorpio could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Scorpio consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 940. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 620 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo 940 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.41 m | |
| Ford Scorpio is 5 cm shorter than the Volvo 940, 13 cm wider, while the height of Ford Scorpio is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 471 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`850 | 1`905 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Volvo 940 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Scorpio has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Volvo 940, so Volvo 940 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Scorpio has
|
Volvo 940 has
| |