Ford Scorpio 1996 vs Jaguar XJ 1994
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 3.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 219 HP | |
| Torque: | 202 NM | 315 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XJ is a more dynamic driving. Ford Scorpio engine produces 72 HP less power than Jaguar XJ, whereas torque is 113 NM less than Jaguar XJ. Due to the lower power, Ford Scorpio reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 11.2 | |
|
The Ford Scorpio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Scorpio consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XJ, which means that by driving the Ford Scorpio over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 81 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| Jaguar XJ gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 5.02 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.31 m | |
| Ford Scorpio is 20 cm shorter than the Jaguar XJ, 8 cm wider, while the height of Ford Scorpio is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 12.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Scorpio is 1.7 metres less than that of the Jaguar XJ, which means Ford Scorpio can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`850 kg | 1`500 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Scorpio has
|
Jaguar XJ has
| |