Ford Scorpio 1996 vs Chrysler Stratus 1995
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 161 HP | |
| Torque: | 202 NM | 218 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Stratus is a more dynamic driving. Ford Scorpio engine produces 14 HP less power than Chrysler Stratus, whereas torque is 16 NM less than Chrysler Stratus. Due to the lower power, Ford Scorpio reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 10.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.2 l/100km | 10.8 l/100km | |
|
By specification Ford Scorpio consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Stratus, which means that by driving the Ford Scorpio over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Ford Scorpio consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Stratus. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 740 km on highway | ||
| 620 km with real consumption | 550 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Scorpio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Chrysler Stratus) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Ford Scorpio) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.37 m | |
|
Ford Scorpio is larger. Ford Scorpio is 7 cm longer than the Chrysler Stratus, 6 cm wider, while the height of Ford Scorpio is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Scorpio is 0.6 metres less than that of the Chrysler Stratus, which means Ford Scorpio can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`850 | 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Scorpio has
|
Chrysler Stratus has
| |